Tell A Friend!
Add Comment

Booker T. Washington’s Historic Home Safe…For Now

Owner withdraws plans to demolish famous house; preservation efforts continue


The owner of Booker T. Washington’s summer home in Fort Salonga has recently withdrawn his petition with the Town of Huntington to have its protected status revoked so it could be torn down.

House on the Hill: Booker T. Washington's historic summer home in Fort Salonga
House on the Hill: Booker T. Washington's historic summer home in Fort Salonga

Financial businessman John Rice, of Northport, who purchased the historic home and its surrounding 1.7 acres for nearly $1.3 million in 2007, had sought to have its historic designation stripped so he could build a much larger retirement home on the site instead. Rice argued through hardship papers filed with the town that the Washington house was uninhabitable, structurally unsound and prevented him from making a return on his investment. He also claimed that engineering reports conducted subsequent to its purchase required the house’s removal in order to remediate the property’s eroding bluff.

 
Rice’s proposal sparked a grassroots movement among local residents, Washington’s direct descendants and others to save the historic home from destruction.
 
Washington, the former slave-turned-voice of the African-American community during the late 1800s and early 1900s, spent the final summers of his life at the reclusive, two-story home overlooking the Long Island Sound. Besides a renowned orator and civil rights pioneer, Washington founded, taught at, and presided over Tuskegee Institute, presently Tuskegee University, for more than 30 years until his death. He was also the first African-American invited to the White House by a U.S. president.
 
An Aug. 12 withdrawal letter from Rice’s new attorney Michael H. Sahn, of Uniondale-based Sahn Ward & Baker PLLC, to Robert C. Hughes, Huntington Town Historian and secretary of its Historic Preservation Committee, which was weighing the petition, stated Rice “is considering alternative plans for the premises,” though it did not elaborate.
 
Sahn tells the Press that Rice, along with his consulting architect and engineers, decided to “take another look at the property” to try to come up with a proposal that would accomplish retaining the famous house while also allowing Rice to “build or develop his own house on the property.”
 
“So that we could create, in a sense, a win-win situation for everybody,” he says.
 
Sahn explains that Rice’s decision to rescind was borne from sensitivity to what has become an emotional issue. “We thought it was better to do that [rethink the plans] without a petition pending that was creating a great deal of concern and generating opposition and lengthy hearings,” he says. “So this will give everybody an opportunity to step back and allow us to formulate plans that we can resubmit to the town.”

Breathtaking: The view of the Long Island Sound from Washington's back porch.
Breathtaking: The view of the Long Island Sound from Washington's back porch


advertisement

Rice’s change of heart follows two articles by the Press ["This House Is History," July 16, 2009; "Preservation Battle Continues," July 30, 2009] and an increasing interest among individuals and organizations to preserve the historic home.

News of the withdrawal was met with split reactions by Thelma Jackson-Abidally and Elise Morris, the two Northport residents spearheading efforts to preserve the Washington house.

Abidally, author of 2000’s African Americans in Northport, An Untold Story, applauded Rice’s decision. She says she is eager to sit down with the businessman, to thank him and begin discussions regarding the historic home’s future.

“I’m very happy,” she says. “I think he’s done a great thing and I kind of personally just want to thank him for withdrawing the petition to demolish the house.”

Morris, who had a phone conversation with Sahn, was more skeptical.

“I did hear the news and it has given me more questions than anything,” she says. “I can’t imagine there’s another spot on the land where he could put this house while he’s building his house. And I don’t know if he intends to incorporate the [Washington] house into his own home… Of course, my big question is: Does this shut down the public discourse? Since it’s all staying on private property now?”

Both women say they will continue awareness efforts, regardless of the withdrawal. Interest is continuing to grow, they say, with more and more individuals and organizations contacting them through their new website, FriendsoftheBookerTWashingtonHouse.org. The duo seeks to preserve the house as a museum or learning center, and will continue their pursuit of having it recognized as a national landmark.

Huntington Town Supervisor Frank Petrone, who had been against the revocation of the house’s historical designation, issued this statement upon the news:

“We are pleased that the application to remove the historic designation from the Booker T. Washington House has been withdrawn and expect that any alternative plans under consideration will satisfy the requirements of such a designation, as well as Town planning and zoning regulations, and afford the proper respect to a landmark that is significant to both Huntington and the nation.”

Sahn says Rice’s exact plan for the Washington house hasn’t been hashed out yet and estimates it would take about a month to formulate. He declined to comment on whether Rice would be willing to turn the house into a museum, or whether a previous offer to donate the house to interested parties still stands.

In Limbo: Glenn Treacher, the Washington house's neighbor, says he is helpless to stop his home from falling into the Sound without a joint remediation of the shared bluff.
In Limbo: Glenn Treacher, the Washington house's neighbor, says he is helpless to stop his home from falling into the Sound without a joint remediation of the shared bluff.

It’s not just preservationists or Washington’s descendants who are eager to hear Rice’s new plans. Glenn Treacher, who lives next-door to the historic home, is also curious. The fate of his house depends on it.

Purchased about six years ago for $1.4 million, Treacher’s house is also slipping into the Sound. The only way it can be stabilized properly, he tells the Press, is through a joint remediation with Rice. Treacher is frustrated and feels helpless, he explains. He adds that he may soon investigate any legal avenues there may be to try and save his home.

“I feel, yup, here we go again,” says Treacher. “I’m in limbo. I have no control of my own destiny on this. I’m tied into the property next door.”

Morris tells the Press she and Abidally will just have to wait and see for right now while Rice and his team re-strategize—hoping for the best, yet standing ready to act in the historic house’s best interest if need be.

“We still want to try to find a way to save this site,” she says.



Leave a Comment

Please use the comment box below for general comments, but if you feel we have made a mistake, typo, or egregious error, let us know about it. Click here to "call us out." We're happy to listen to your concerns.

2 Responses to “Booker T. Washington’s Historic Home Safe…For Now”

  1. Helen A. Dara says:

    Thank you for the information. I often walk on the beach and see this house as it should be, restored and beautiful. If I were wealthy I would give it the attention it deserves. I’m sick to death of the modernization of Long Island. Our history is so important. We should preserve it.

  2. Elise Morris says:

    Chris, once again, you’ve written an outstanding article regarding the continued efforts to save the home. Thank you for keeping this issue in the forefront.